Technological Change in Israel: World-System (1960-2100)

 


Israel is a World-System leader in Technological Change. Google AI Notes:


However, the description has been challenged: The Myth of Israel Innovation. Using the IL_L20 Models, the hypothesis of Israel TECH dominance can be tested.

The best short-term model, using AIC Statistics to make the selection, was the Business-As-Usual (BAU) Model. The best Attractor Path model was the Regional Input (MEA) model. Neither TECHP (Productivity) nor TECHE (Efficiency) models were strong competitors (see the graphic above).

 

This post compares the models.




Notes

Within Systems Theory there are three types of technology: Learning by Doing, Technical Productivity (TECHP) and Technical Efficiency (TECHE). Learning by Doing is measured by the coefficient on the first Growth State variable (usually F[1,1]). TECHP and TECHE are measured by indexes (see below). For more information, see the About page.

IL_TECHP Measurement Model


Technical Productivity (TECHP) in Israel is measured by three indexes that explain over 98% of the variation in the underlying indicators (CO2/N, E/N, GDP/N and L/N). TECHP1 measures overall growth in the indicators and explains over 88% of the variation. TECHP2 is an historical controller (E/N - L/N - Q/L), energy productivity compared to Employment and Labor productivity. TECHNP3 is an historical controller (L/N - Q/N - CO2/N) comparing Employment Productivity compared to GDP Productivity and CO2 productivity.


Over time, TECHP1 reaches a limit after 2000, TECHP2 is relatively constant (except for the period after WWII) and TECHP3 is cyclical.


IL_TECHE Measurement Model

Technical Efficiency is measured by the Intensive Coefficients of the Kaya Identity. In Israel, TECHE1 = (E/Q + Q/L - L/N - CO2/N), an historical Energy-Labor Productivity controller compared to Employment and Emissions that explains 0ver 72% of the variation. TECHE2 = (CO2/E + Q/L - L/N - E/Q) an historical Emission-Employment controller compared to Employment and Energy Efficiency. TECHE3 = (Overall Growth).


Over time, TECHE1 has been decreasing, TECHE2 has been relatively stable and TECHE3 has been mildly cyclical.



IL_TECHP State Space Model



IL_TECHE State Space Model

\
The IL TECHE-Input Model is nonlinear, cyclical and unstable.

IL_SYS BAU Model


The IL Business-as-Usual (BAU) Model is cyclical and unstable. The  Learning by Doing coefficient is F[2,2] = 1.02477066 driving unstable growth.

IL_SYS MEA-Input Model


The IL MEA_Input Model is stable and cyclical. The F[3,3] (IL3) coefficient is close to a Random Walk.

IL_SYS Model AIC Statistics

\
The AIC Statistics for the step-ahead models are presented above. There is a lot of overlap in the models.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

World-System (1960-2100) WL20 Technology Growth Paths

Image
The 2025 Nobel Prize in Economics was awarded for both advances in our theoretical and  historical understanding of Technological Change . One reading of the work by  Joel Mokyr ,  Philippe Aghion  and  Peter Hewitt  is that new discoveries created by the random historical process of invention will always provide the technologies (through Creative Destruction ) necessary for continued, exponential economic growth.  The forecast above, generated by different WL20 Models , shows that emphasis on Technical Efficiency ( TECHE ), particularly reducing Emission Intensity (CO2/EG), provides the best future growth path for the World System. Economic Theory seems to be mostly focused on Technical  Productivity ( TECHP ). The historical work for this  Cornucopian  conclusion about the Future ( Joel Mokyr )  was based on studying the Industrial  Revolution during the period 1500-1700. The theoretical work ( Philippe Aghi...
Read more

World-System (1950-2150) Stable French Technology Cycles

Image
   The 2025 Nobel Prize in Economics ( here ) was awarded for having explained the role of innovation and  Creative Destruction  in  Sustained Economic Growth . Particularly interesting (to me) was the Aghion and Hewitt paper   A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction , which won them part of the Prize. Does the 2025 Nobel Prize have anything to say about current French economic development and political instability? I have two explicit models for technological change, one for Productivity change ( TECHP ) and another for Efficiency change ( TECHE ). The models are based on  State Space  indexes (see the Notes below) constructed using  Principal Components Analysis  ( PCA ). The  Phase Space  for the FR TECHE model is displayed above. The  Phase Space  for the FR TECHP model is displayed below. Both models are cyclical and stable with periods of over a Century (see the  Notes  ...
Read more

About

Image
  This blog documents an approach to Technological Change that is consistent with General Systems Theory, which contains models that cover Neoclassical Growth Technology, Learning-by-Doing Technology, World-systems Theory and Classical models of Technology to include Schumpeter's Creative Destruction. None of these models are consistent over time within a single country and across countries. Partly, the changing approaches to Technology are historical and partly they are due to data limitations that prevent consistent testing over all time periods and countries.  Therefore, there is no general conclusion about technology accept that it may follow one of the time patterns above (unlimited exponential growth, growth and decline or decline). Moreover, Technological change is not always the best model to describe growth across time and countries. Different models may dominate during particular periods and in particular countries.
Read more